L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — Blitz Index 45 (C)

L3Harris scores 45 — a record $53.2 billion backlog and growth re-accelerating to 7.1%, held back by a single-customer moat and single-digit speed.

Last re-scored: November 6, 2026.

Score breakdown

Think we scored it wrong? Score it yourself →

Radar axes (0–100): Moat 45.0 · Speed 60.0 · Creative 66.7.

Watch item

Gates: G1 ✓ (confirmed — growth resuming, with a second curve in missiles and space) · G2 ✓ (confirmed — the aerospace and defense market ceiling is about seven times the bar, though a missile-only market definition would fall short). 20 points below the 65-point threshold — the backlog is real, but the speed is not blitz speed. Watch the Q4 FY2026 results, which were not yet disclosed at scoring, and whether the Missile Solutions curve converts its orders into a second growth engine.

Strengths

• Growth re-accelerating: Q3 revenue $6,060M (+7.1%, organic +9%), FY2026 guidance raised to $23.5–23.7B, TTM revenue $23,333M
• Profitable growth: operating margin 7.3% → 9.7% → 13.0% in Q3, Q3 net income $632M, Q3 free cash flow $1,260M (+195%)
• Record backlog $53.2B with a Q3 book-to-bill of 3.2x — about 2.3 years of revenue visibility
• Self-funded capital structure: cash $2,471M plus short-term investments $550M, FY2025 operating cash flow $3,106M, and a $1.0B bond issue completed
• A second growth curve: Missile Solutions (DoW $1.0B anchor investment) plus space, with Space & Mission Systems at 50.4% of nine-month revenue

Concerns

• Single-digit growth: FY2025 +2.5%, Q3 +7.1%, FY2026 guidance +7.5–8.4% — not blitz speed
• Weak network effects: defense procurement is a monopsony, so there is no platform-style lock-in (B1 5 of 18)
• U.S. government revenue at 75% — single-customer concentration tied to budgets, administrations and procurement policy (D2 −2)
• Debt of $10,996M (net debt $7,975M) plus a further $1.0B bond issued on 2026-11-05, with current maturities up to $1,815M
• Environmental liability of $700M (net exposure about $179M) plus ITAR, EAR and FCPA regulatory exposure (D4 −2)

Research notes

Thesis: a record backlog, priced at mature-prime speed

L3Harris Technologies enters the BlitzLab record with a first scoring of 45 out of 100, grade C, built from Speed 15 out of 25, Moat 27 out of 60, Creative Destruction 10 out of 15, and deductions of 7. The total sits 20 points below the 65-point line, and the shape of the score is the story: on the radar conversion used by the model, Creative Destruction converts to 66.7, Speed to 60.0, and Moat to only 45.0. This is a mature defense prime — trailing-twelve-month revenue of $23,333 million — whose order book has never been larger and whose growth has just re-accelerated, yet whose moat, measured on the frozen v1.0 anchors, remains the thinnest part of the case. Both gates pass, so the scoring proceeds, but the second gate passes only on the broad aerospace and defense market definition, and that qualification runs through everything that follows.

Growth: re-acceleration, but single-digit

Growth, A1, scores 5 out of 10, and the item captures a re-acceleration that is real but capped. Total revenue rose from $19,419 million in fiscal 2023 to $21,325 million in fiscal 2024, up 9.8%, then slowed to $21,865 million in fiscal 2025, up only 2.5%. The third quarter of fiscal 2026, reported on October 29, 2026, turned the line back up: revenue of $6,060 million, up 7.1% year on year and 9% organically, a record quarter. Trailing-twelve-month revenue reached $23,333 million, 6.7% above fiscal 2025, and fiscal 2026 guidance was raised on the same day to $23.5–23.7 billion, implying growth of 7.5–8.4%. The absolute level is solid — a record quarter and guidance raised — but the rate stays in single digits, and that is what holds the item at 5. Defense-industry growth, the file notes, is structurally single-digit, and a blitz score cannot be built on a 7–9% growth rate.

The quality of that growth is where the file finds more to like. The GAAP operating margin has widened steadily, from 7.3% in fiscal 2023 to 9.0% in fiscal 2024 and 9.7% in fiscal 2025, reaching 13.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 against 11.0% a year earlier, a gain of 200 basis points. Third-quarter net income was $632 million and free cash flow was $1,260 million, up 195%. The segment picture is less uniform: segment operating margin on a non-GAAP basis was 15.9% in the quarter, unchanged from a year earlier, and margins varied widely across the segments, from 10.9% at Space & Mission Systems and 12.0% at Missile Solutions to 25.2% at the communications segment. Growth and margin expansion are therefore arriving together at the consolidated level, but the segment margin has not moved, so the file calls the “growth plus margin expansion” signature incomplete.

The backlog is the visibility

The backlog is the strongest evidence in the file, and the score treats it as growth visibility rather than as growth itself. Backlog stood at $53.2 billion, a record high, equal to about 2.3 years of trailing-twelve-month revenue, and the third-quarter book-to-bill ratio was 3.2 times — more than three dollars of orders for every dollar of revenue in the quarter. The large awards behind it are named: THAAD propulsion at $6.3 billion, PAC-3 MSE at $4.7 billion, GMLRS at $250 million, VAMPIRE at more than $500 million, and NGJ-LB at $876 million. That order book is the evidence for two items at once: share-gain velocity, A4, scored 3 out of 5, because growth above the market's rate implies share gains, and distribution scalability, B2, scored 7 out of 18, because the prime-contractor position keeps converting into repeat orders. The file is careful, though, about what the backlog does not prove: it is a promise of future revenue, and its conversion depends on budgets, procurement timing, and execution.

A second curve in missiles and space

The second growth curve is Missile Solutions, built on Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion and hypersonics. The U.S. Department of War agreed on January 13, 2026 to make a $1.0 billion convertible preferred anchor investment in the business, and the company has expressed an intention to pursue an initial public offering of Missile Solutions in the second half of 2026; the progress of that offering had not been disclosed at the scoring date. Alongside it, the Camden “Arsenal of Freedom” solid rocket motor production facility opened in October 2026, backed by a multi-year production-capacity expansion and modernization plan of more than $3 billion. The file treats the combination — a government anchor investment, a stated intention to list the business, and a new production facility — as the visible scaffolding of a second blitz, while noting that the listing itself remains undisclosed in its progress.

Space is the other half of the second curve. Space & Mission Systems accounted for 50.4% of revenue in the first nine months of the fiscal year, making it the largest growth axis in the current business rather than a side bet. The file pairs it with Missile Solutions as the two curves that carry gate 1: growth is not only resuming in the core business, it has a second engine in missiles and space. What neither curve has yet done is change the growth rate into blitz territory. The second curve is real, funded, and producing revenue; it is not yet fast.

Speed: self-funded, productive, but not blitz-fast

Speed scores 15 out of 25, and its four items show a company that funds itself. Capital velocity, A2, scores 4 out of 5: cash of $2,471 million plus short-term investments of $550 million, operating cash flow of $2,223 million in the first nine months — $1,439 million of it in the third quarter alone — operating cash flow of $3,106 million in fiscal 2025, and free cash flow of about $2,682 million in fiscal 2025. Capital is not the bottleneck. Access to the bond market was demonstrated on November 5, 2026, when the company completed a $1.0 billion bond issue, $500 million at 5.200% due 2029 and $500 million at 5.400% due 2032. The item stops at 4 rather than 5 because this is self-funded growth, not blitz-speed external financing, following the mature-company convention for self-sustaining businesses. Hiring and productivity, A3, scores 3 out of 5: trailing-twelve-month revenue of $23,333 million against about 45,000 employees implies revenue per employee of about $519,000, including about 18,000 engineers and scientists, but the headcount figure is dated January 2, 2026 and the third-quarter filing disclosed no newer number, so a hiring blitz cannot be evidenced. Share-gain velocity, A4, scores 3 out of 5: the company's revenue is about 2.8% of the aerospace and defense market, a small absolute share, but its growth rate exceeds the market's growth rate, and the record backlog supports an inference of share gains, though no directly measured market-share figure exists.

Moat: a prime franchise, not a network effect

Moat scores 27 out of 60, the weakest section relative to its weight, and the file names the reason in its first item. Network effects, B1, score 5 out of 18. Defense procurement is dominated by a single buyer, the U.S. government — a monopsony — so more users do not structurally raise the value for all users the way a platform does. What exists instead is lock-in of a different kind: an installed base of fielded systems, where interoperability, certification, training, and spares make replacement difficult, and where the value of communications and sensor networks rises as more users join. The file is explicit that this is contract- and certification-based lock-in, not a network effect, and scores it at the bottom of the data-and-ecosystem band. Distribution scalability, B2, scores 7 out of 18: government procurement is the distribution channel, and the prime-contractor position plus relationships with the Department of Defense and allied nations produces repeat awards, evidenced by the record backlog, the 3.2 times book-to-bill, and the large awards listed above. But the procurement cycle is long and hostage to politics and budgets, so this is not viral or product-led distribution; it sits in the upper-middle of the repeatable paid-sales band.

Market size, B3, scores 8 out of 12: the market is large — $820.67 billion in 2024 on The Business Research Company's estimate — and the company's revenue is only about 2.8% of it, so the remaining room is large, but market growth is moderate and the absolute scale is in the hundreds of billions rather than the trillions seen in AI infrastructure, so the full mark is not given. Gross profit, B4, scores 7 out of 12 on the margin expansion documented above, from 7.3% to 9.7% and then 13.0% in the quarter. The absolute level, 9.7–13.0%, is low for a software business but characteristic of defense, and the segment margin standing still at 15.9% keeps the item from rising further.

Creative destruction: replacing legacy systems, led by the customer

Creative Destruction scores 10 out of 15, the strongest section on the radar, with all three items at 3 or 4 out of 5. The order being displaced, C1, scores 4 out of 5: solid rocket motors, hypersonics, resilient communications, and space-based missile warning are replacing legacy platforms, and the order being displaced is clear and large — world military expenditure of $2,718 billion in 2024 on SIPRI's figures. The item stops short of the full mark because the displacement is led by the Department of Defense's modernization, not by L3Harris, which participates as one prime among several. Irreversible behavior change, C2, scores 3 out of 5: once the military fields a new capability — missile defense, space-based warning, resilient communications — it does not return to the legacy system, and the $53.2 billion backlog plus the more-than-$3 billion multi-year capacity expansion show adoption spreading. But this is a change in government procurement and force structure, not a consumer behavior change of the kind the anchor describes at the top of the scale. Cost-structure change, C3, also scores 3 out of 5: production modernization is under way, the Camden facility opened in October 2026, and the operating margin expansion from 7.3% to 13.0% shows operating leverage at work — yet the cost structure of a defense business is set by government contracts, with fixed-price contracts of $16,344 million against cost-type contracts of $5,521 million in fiscal 2025, so the company alone cannot restructure industry costs, and no collapse in industry costs has been demonstrated.

Deductions: debt, concentration, and a $700M environmental liability

Deductions total 7 points, so there is no FLAG: the FLAG line in the model sits at 15 points of deductions, leaving 8 points of headroom. Debt, D1, scores minus 3 out of a possible minus 10. Total debt was $10,996 million — long-term debt of $9,181 million plus current maturities of $1,815 million — and net debt was $7,975 million. Total debt is 47.1% of trailing-twelve-month revenue, net debt is 1.9 times trailing-twelve-month operating cash flow of $4,185 million, debt is 54.3% of equity and 25.1% of assets. This is not distress: operating cash flow of $3,106 million in fiscal 2025 and free cash flow of about $2,682 million provide ample coverage, and the company holds cash of $2,471 million plus short-term investments of $550 million. The deduction reflects scale and direction: the absolute debt is large, a further $1.0 billion bond was issued on November 5, 2026, and current maturities of $1,815 million are up from $673 million at the end of fiscal 2025, raising the near-term repayment burden.

Revenue quality, D2, scores minus 2. There is no restatement, no auditor change, and no audit-opinion issue, and no material weakness in internal controls was disclosed — a contrast the file notes with Trimble, which carries an active material weakness. The deduction comes from concentration: U.S. government revenue was 75% of the total in fiscal 2025, counting direct sales and sales through prime contractors, a structural single-customer risk tied to government budgets, administrations, and procurement policy. Fixed-price contracts of $16,344 million add a second risk, since cost overruns on fixed-price work compress margins. No fraud, related-party revenue, or recognition distortion was found. Governance, D3, scores 0: a single class of common stock with no dual-class voting, 186,200,733 shares outstanding as of October 23, 2026, and no founder or private-equity sponsor control — the standard governance of a large mature listed company. Regulatory and social cost, D4, scores minus 2: no material litigation, no securities class action, and no SEC investigation was disclosed, and the provision for litigation considered likely to be decided adversely was described as not material. The deduction reflects two standing exposures: an environmental liability of $700 million as of October 2, 2026, with $521 million recoverable, leaving a net exposure of about $179 million, across 113 sites where the company has been designated a potentially responsible party; and the regulatory exposure inherent to a defense business under ITAR, EAR, and FCPA, including the government's routine compliance reviews, where an adverse finding could affect contract eligibility.

The gates: both pass — and the second pass depends on the market definition

Gate 1, sustained growth or a second growth curve, passes on a confirmed basis. The mature-company test is met twice over: growth resumed after the fiscal 2025 slowdown, with third-quarter revenue up 7.1% and guidance raised to $23.5–23.7 billion, and a second curve exists in Missile Solutions and space. The record backlog and the 3.2 times book-to-bill support the visibility of that growth. Gate 2, a ten-year market ceiling at least ten times current revenue, also passes on a confirmed basis, but the file declares its market definition before doing the arithmetic: revenue is total GAAP revenue, since L3Harris has no pass-through fee character that would require a contribution-profit normalization, and the addressable market is the aerospace and defense company revenue market — the revenue defense companies actually earn — not total government spending. The bar is about $233.3 billion, ten times trailing-twelve-month revenue of $23,333 million. On The Business Research Company's estimates, the market grows from $820.67 billion in 2024 to $1,098.86 billion in 2029 at a compound annual rate of 5.8%, extrapolating to about $1,631 billion in 2036, roughly 7.0 times the bar. On the most conservative vendor estimate, Market Research Future's $681.17 billion in 2024 growing at 2.57% to $900.49 billion in 2035, the 2036 figure is about $924 billion, still about 4.0 times the bar. Every vendor estimate clears the bar comfortably.

The sensitivity the file records matters as much as the pass. SIPRI's world military expenditure of $2,718 billion in 2024 is government spending in total — procurement, personnel, and operations together — so it is not directly the same as the addressable company-revenue market, but as an upper reference it extrapolates to about $4,107 billion in 2036 at Deloitte's 3.5% growth rate, about 17.6 times the bar, and Zion Market Research's $885.20 billion rising to $2,027.39 billion by 2034 also clears the bar by a wide margin. The narrower test is the one the file flags for the next version of the model: judged on the missile market alone, the company would fall short of the bar, so the gate pass depends on the broad aerospace and defense definition rather than on the company's flagship sub-market. The re-blitz markets themselves are large — missile and ammunition procurement plus research and development budgets alone were requested at $30.6 billion for fiscal 2024, up 340% from $9 billion in fiscal 2015, and the space economy was $613 billion in 2024 with a projection of $1.8 trillion by 2035 — but the file's verdict rests on the whole market, and the sensitivity is recorded rather than hidden.

Blitzscaling fit: the efficient grower, waiting for a second blitz

The blitzscaling-fit analysis gives L3Harris a label the file states plainly: the efficient grower. The main levers are distribution, meaning government procurement and prime status, and product, meaning missiles, space, and electronic warfare; the secondary lever is the platform character of interoperable communications networks; the weak lever is network effects. The speed-versus-efficiency trade was made in favor of efficiency: the operating margin widened from 7.3% to 13.0% while growth stayed in single digits, the opposite of the classic blitz pattern of sacrificing profitability for speed. That is the behavior of a company that finished its first blitz long ago and converted to efficient growth at $23.3 billion of revenue. The file's judgment is that L3Harris is a mature prime in the waiting room for a second blitz, with the Missile Solutions listing, the Department of War's $1.0 billion investment, and the $53.2 billion backlog as the platform for it. The single largest blitzscaling risk is stated as one line: the government as the single customer. If defense budgets fall, procurement is delayed, or a rival prime wins the next round, growth, orders, and margins move together, and the backlog, large as it is, consists of government contracts that are not free of budget and administration risk. The Department of War's investment is both a signal of confidence and a deepening of the same dependence.

What to watch

What to watch follows directly from the score. The first is the fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results, which had not been announced at the scoring date and were excluded from this assessment; they will show whether the re-acceleration holds and whether the margin expansion continues. The second is the Missile Solutions curve: the progress of the listing, which had not been disclosed at scoring, the conversion of the $1.0 billion anchor investment and the Camden capacity into orders, and whether space keeps its share of revenue. The third is backlog conversion: whether the $53.2 billion backlog and the 3.2 times book-to-bill turn into revenue on schedule, and whether the large awards — THAAD propulsion at $6.3 billion and PAC-3 at $4.7 billion — execute at the margins the current profile implies. The fourth is the balance sheet: whether debt stabilizes after the November 5 bond issue and whether current maturities are refinanced or repaid without pressure. The fifth is the government customer itself: budget decisions and procurement timing are the single variable that touches every item in the file at once. A future rescoring will have new figures for revenue, backlog, margins, and cash flow, and the honest test of this 45-point assessment is whether those figures move the items that currently keep it down: the single-digit growth rate, the thin network-effect moat, and the government concentration that caps both.

More Frontier companies

Other Frontier names on the Blitz Index, highest score first: Rocket Lab (62/B), Tesla (62/B), Illumina, Inc. (61/B).

Next earnings

Q4 2026 · Expected

Coverage

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. · Next earnings unconfirmed at scoring · Score 45 · Grade C

Embed this score

Copy the HTML below to show this score on your site. The badge links back to this page and updates automatically when the score changes.

<a href="https://blitzlab.app/companies/lhx/"><img src="https://blitzlab.app/badge/lhx.svg" alt="L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Blitz Index 45/C — BlitzLab"></a> Copy HTML

Preview:

BlitzLab scores businesses against a scholar’s standard — not investment advice. No price targets, no buy/sell recommendations. Figures are from SEC filings (XBRL) as labeled in the source scorecard.